Someone's comment retweeted by my follower said "At a McDonald store, I found some men whose bags are decorated with girl characters. A family was also watching them. The mother of the family taught her son that those people(these men having bags) are likely to be criminals. I guess these men didn't commit a crime."
As I introduced few months ago, there are a lot of parents who has negative images against cartoons including sexual description. Though the relation between readers of such cartoons and sex criminals hasn't yet proved, anti-sex cartoon activists want cartoons to be restricted. I would like to ask the activists why movies or dramas which describe wars are not targeted by anti-sex cartoon activists. Movies or dramas including scenes of killing people should have bad influence on children.
The activists' assertion is that children who have watched sexual description can imitate the description. If so, we shouldn't rule out the possibility that children who have watched description of murder imitate the description.
I thought the reason. Most of the activists are satisfied with sex lives with their husbands or wives. The fact that the activists mostly consist of parents demonstrates the reason. So, they wouldn't be damaged if such cartoons are restricted. On the other hand, they would have inconvenience if movies or dramas including war related description.
Conclusively speaking, they want to eliminate everything which can have a little bit bad influence on condition that they won't be damaged.
This is nothing but egoism.
